Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 N.C. App. 367 - State v. Garnett

4 N.C. App. 367 - State v. Garnett’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2008

22 state decisions

14019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Overman · State v. Turner · State v. Brown · State v. Morgan · State v. Booker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[m]ere technical error will not entitle defendant to a new trial; it is necessary that error be material and prejudicial and amount to a denial of some substantial right. Whether technical error is prejudicial is to be determined upon the basis of whether there is a reasonable possibility that, had the error in question not been committed, a different result would have been reached at the trial out of which the appeal arises.” State v. Garnett, 4 N.C. App. 367, 373 , 167 S.E. 2d 63 (1969), quoting 3 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 167.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.