Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 NCAPP 99 - Richardson v. Richardson

Richardson v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1970
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Moore v. W O O W, Inc. · Sguros v. Sguros

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to state a cause of action, it is not necessary to put in the complaint the statute upon which the pleader is relying. ‘The function of a complaint is to state in a plain and concise manner the material, essential or ultimate facts which constitute the cause of action, but not the evidence to prove them. ... It is not necessary to plead the law. The law arises upon the facts alleged, and the court is presumed to know the law.’ Moore v. W O O W, Inc., 253 N.C. 1 , 116 S.E. 2d 186 . A complaint is to be judged by the facts alleged therein, and if the allegations are sufficient, reference to a particular statute is unnecessary. Therefore, such a reference may be regarded as surplusage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.