State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Irish · State v. White · State v. LeGrand · State v. Oliver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record of the Court’s plea taking on May 17, 1991 clearly does not inform Mr. Lee of his right to a trial by jury. As such the Court does not believe the May 17[,] 1991 plea may be used for purposes of enhancement. So Ordered. /s/ Gale Pokomy Lancaster County Judge”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.