Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 NEV 178 - State v. Kruttschnitt

State v. Kruttschnitt’s Empirical Analysis

1868

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
9
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1983

18 state decisions

501868187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eastabrook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We know of no principle or practice by which a suit on a bond against A., B., and C. can be united with an action for damages against A. alone. The plaintiff will have to elect to prosecute the suit against the principal alone for the whole amount claimed, or against the principal and sureties for the $2,500. The two actions cannot be united.”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.