Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 N.H. 196

Buel v. Miller

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 15, 1827

Superior Court of New Hampshire · decided 1827-10-15

Assumpsit on a contract in writing made the 12th August, 1825, in which, after reciting that there was a dispute between the parties about a certain line on the southerly side of said Buel’s lapd, it was agreed that certain referees should settle the said contested line, and that the parties should make and execute quitclaim deeds, each to the other, in such manner as to carry into effect the decision of the referees, and that whichever of the parties should refuse to make…

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1927

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1827-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the court.

¶1We have considered this case and are of opinion that executory agreements in writing, not under seal, may, before breach, be discharged and abandoned by a subsequent unwritten agreement, as well in cases wh ere the original contract is required by the statute of frauds to be in writing, as where writing is unnecessary. The law is so laid down in Phillip’s Ev. 444, and seems to be so settled by the cases he cites.

¶2We are therefore of opinion that the verdict must be set aside and a new trial be had.

/4/nh/196 · .json · Public domain