Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 NY2D 224 - People v. Richardson

People v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2011

13 state decisions

901958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dennis v. United States · United States v. Dennis · People v. Northcott · Overholser v. De Marcos · 78 Ga. App. 153 - Loomis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We perceive no ground for complaint that adherence to such a rule may work an injustice upon a defendant or affect him unfairly. In the first place, the defendant is always able to suggest to his lawyer the matters to be discussed or stressed in his closing address to the jury. In the second place, the trial court, as previously observed, is empowered to allow the defendant himself to sum up if, in the exercise of a wise discretion, it deems such action called for. 173 N.Y.S.2d at 590 , 149 N.E.2d at 877 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.