¶1The decision by the court at special term was quite as favorable to the plaintiff as the facts and law would warrant, and the judgment entered in the action should be affirmed, with costs. The reasons assigned by the learned justice who tried the action as they appear in his opinion, are so far satisfactory as to render it unnecessary to further discuss the questions involved. 27either the facts nor the law establish in favor of the plaintiff any right or equity superior to that which the judgment herein secures to her. All concur.
4 N.Y.S. 287
Sheldon v. Hoffnagle
Decided February 7, 1889
New York Supreme Court · decided 1889-02-07
'Appeal from special term, Essex county. Action by Sarah C. Sheldon against Abraham W. Hoffnagle and others. The following opinion was rendered below by Tapp an, J., at the June term, 1886: “This is an action to recover dower; the trial was had before the court without a jury. The facts upon which the rights of the parties depend are stated in the findings of fact, upon which judgment is ordered, and are restated in this opinion.
Decided 1889-02-07