¶1The moving party does not bring himself within the rule as to rearguments laid down in Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. The question as to the appealability of the order of the general term of the city court was the principal question before our general term. The appellant was advised by the opinion written in the city court, and printed in his own case, of that very question, and he had ample opportunity to be heard upon it. Motion denied, with ©10 costs. All concur.
4 N.Y.S. 834
Uhler v. Ryer
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided April 1, 1889
New York Court of Common Pleas · decided 1889-04-01
On motion for reargument. The case is stated in 2 H. Y. Supp. 729. An appeal by defendant to the court of common pleas was dismissed because the order was not appealable, (no opinion being written) and appellant makes this motion.
Decided 1889-04-01