4 Ohio App. 3d 158 - State v. McFarland’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 63 Ohio App. 3d 831 - State v. McCrone (1989), 124 Md. App. 183 - Brown v. State (1998)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams · Sibron v. State of New York Peters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Therefore, we must examine the specific circumstances of the detention here to determine whether the extent of the police intrusion on defendant’s liberty was justified by a sufficiently strong suspicion based on specific and articulable facts. If so, the temporary detention was lawful, and the subsequent arrest based on reasonable cause ascertained during the detention was valid. * * *” Id. at 160 , 4 OBR at 254, 446 N.E. 2d at 1171-1172 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“circumstances which justify a temporary detention for a few minutes may not suffice to justify detention for thirty to forty minutes, or rigorous detention for fifteen minutes without active investigative effort”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Royer at 498 . Whenever a person's freedom of movement is curtailed by police using either force or a show of authority, that person is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.