4 Ohio App. 3d 252 - State v. Kish’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dehass · State v. Swiger · State ex rel. Wise v. Chand · State v. Simpson · 12 Ohio App. 2d 38 - State v. Kay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Statements made by a trial judge during the progress of a trial and within hearing of the jury are of the same effect as though embodied in the charge to the jury, and, where such remarks or questioning may lend themselves to being interpreted as an opinion on the part of the judge as to the credibility of witnesses or of a defendant or an opinion on his part as to the facts of the case, prejudicial error results. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.