4 Ohio App. 3d 308 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Entrapment is a ‘confession and avoidance’ defense in which the defendant admits committing the acts charged, but claims that the criminal design arose with the state’s agent. * * * The primary consideration in any determination of entrapment is the defendant’s predisposition to commit the crime.” (Citations omitted.)”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Carter, 07-Ca-4 (9-28-2007) · State v. Hill, Unpublished Decision (9-23-2005)

2. “The primary consideration in any determination of entrapment is the defendant's predisposition to commit the crime.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Tobey, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006) · State v. Deitz, 06ca008885 (5-21-2007)

3. “a line must be drawn between the trap for the unwary innocent and the trap for the unwary criminal.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Tobey, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006) · State v. Deitz, 06ca008885 (5-21-2007)