4 Ohio App. 3d 64 - Fulton v. Aszman’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 77 Ohio App. 3d 133 - Howard v. Wills (1991), 109 Ohio App. 3d 42 - Davis v. Sun Refining & Marketing Co. (1996)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Logsdon v. Graham Ford Co. · 8 Ohio App. 2d 208 - Ralston v. Grinder · 25 Ohio App. 2d 117 - Hellkamp v. Boiman · 22 Ohio App. 318 - Post Pub. Co. v. Schickling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, he may so amend it at any time within twenty-eight days after it is served. Otherwise a party may amend his pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party. Leave of court shall be freely given when justice so requires. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We hold, therefore, that Civ. R. 54(C), applying only to amendments of the demand is an exception to the court approval or party consent provisions of Civ. R. 15(A). Since Civ. R. 54(C) makes no provision either for court approval or party consent, as long as the amendment is made not later than seven days before trial, the demand as such may be amended, pro forma, and neither court consent nor opposing party approval is a prerequisite to its effectiveness.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * [A] demand for judgment which seeks a judgment for money shall limit the claimant to the sum claimed in the demand unless he amends his demand not later than seven days before the commencement of the trial. Additional service of process is not necessary upon such amendment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.