¶1Toneff contends in the Supreme Court that where a witness suddenly coming upon a co-conspirator, while latter is operating a still, declarations made concerning the operations *755and ownership of the still are not admissible in evidence.
4 Ohio Law. Abs. 754
Toneff v. State
Decided August 22, 1926
Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1926-08-22
Decided 1926-08-22