4 Or. App. 210 - Jellum v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1973
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who commits sodomy or the crime against nature, or any act or practice of sexual perversity, either with mankind or beast, or sustains osculatory relations with the private parts of any person, or permits such relations to be sustained with his private parts, shall be punished. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jellum v. Cupp“unnatural conduct contrary to the course of nature”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jellum v. Cupp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.