4 Or. App. 269 - State v. Downing’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1972
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The right of every criminally accused to have a speedy trial is beyond dispute. State v. Sieckmann, Or. App., 91 Adv.Sh. 281, 474 P.2d 367 (1970); Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 , 87 S.Ct. 988 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1 (1967). Furthermore, it is a well established rule in Oregon that the state has a duty to afford the accused a speedy trial and the accused is not required to take affirmative action to enforce this right. State v. Vawter, 236 Or. 85 , 386 P.2d 915 (1963); Bevel v. Gladden, 232 Or. 578 , 376 P.2d 117 (1962). * * *" 4 Or. App. at ___, 478 P.2d at 422.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.