¶1Defendant, appearing with counsel, pleaded guilty *296to obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of OES 165.205. She was given the maximum sentence.
¶2On appeal she contends (1) that she was not fully advised of her rights, and (2) that the sentence was excessive.
¶3Her first assignment of error presents no issue for review. OES 138.050; State v. Brudos, 3 Or App 239, 471 P2d 861, Sup Ct review denied (1970).
¶4Her second assignment of error has no merit.
¶5Affirmed.
¶6 While it is not determinative of the issue, we note from the record that defendant is not a first offender.