Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Or. App. 336 - State v. Seeger

4 Or. App. 336 - State v. Seeger’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2007

16 state decisions

1101971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'if proof of defendant's guilt is strong, the challenged conduct or remark will not be presumed prejudicial'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “advisory to the jury. The jury may reject a witness' testimony, but it need not do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it's your duty to disregard all of that witness' testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.