Cole v. Bartels’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co. · Demoski v. New · State v. University of Alaska · State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Nicholson · Reid v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the reasonableness of the number of attorneys used.” . Rule 82(b)(3)(E) maintains that an award may be varied based upon “the attorney's efforts to minimize fees.” . Op. at 1200 n. 54. . Id. . Id. . Rule 82(b)(3)(F) maintains that an award may be varied based upon”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ware v. Ware“the financial impact of the passage of time was thus incorporated into the jury's damage award, any award of prejudgment interest on this amount would . constitute a double recovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the superior court did not abuse its discretion in awarding full, actual attorney's fees under Rule 82”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Keenan v. Meyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.