Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Silv. Ct. App. 313

Moore v. Simmons

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1892

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1892-06-17

<p>Appeal. Former decision.—Where, notwithstanding the former decision of the court of appeals, the referee, upon evidence, which does not alter the defendant’s case in any aspect to his advantage, dismisses the complaint, when he ought to grant judgment in his favor, the judgment will he again reversed, and a new trial ordered.</p>

Relies on Moore v. . American Loan and Trust Co.

Decided 1892-06-17

Per Curiam.

¶1—Upon the evidence contained in this record, the case is not altered in favor of the defendant from the case presented to this court on the former appeal, our decision of which is reported in 115 N. Y. 65. We then held that the evidence raised only a question of law, which we decided in favor of the plaintiff.

¶2If the views of this court upon such questions are to he followed, a plain case in favor of the plaintiff was again made out on the new trial before the referee, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff should therefore have been given. Notwithstanding our former decision, the referee, upon evidence which did not alter the defendant’s case in any aspect to his advantage, dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff, when he ought to have granted judgment in his favor.

¶3For this clear error the judgment should again be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

¶4All concur.

/4/silvctapp/313 · .json · Public domain