Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 SO2D 749 - Richey v. Swink

Richey v. Swink’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1983

3 state decisions

1019411950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[9-11] * * * whether the accident is within the policy’s coverage may be determined only from the contents of the policy. The burden rested upon plaintiff, not defendants, to make out his case against the alleged insurer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Touching this issue the lower court in written reasons for judgment, said: ‘During the trial counsel for plaintiff and defendants had a discussion about the policy and about producing it and filing it in evidence, plaintiff contending that the defendants had admitted the existence of the policy in their answer, and defendants contending they had made no such admission. * * * ’ ”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.