Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 So. 3d 1253

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-03-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on 969 So. 2d 238 - Brooks v. State · 905 So. 2d 111 - State v. Anderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court’s denial of appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed in all respects. Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to raise his claim of scoresheet error in a Rule 3.850 motion where the “would-have-been-imposed” harmless error standard will apply to his claim of scoresheet error. State v. Anderson, 905 So.2d 111, 112 (Fla.2005); see also Brooks v. State, 969 So.2d 238, 243 n. 8 (Fla.2007).

GROSS, C.J., HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
/4/so3d/1253 · .json · Public domain