4 So. 3d 24 - JLD v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · Chastine v. Broome · McFadden v. State · 742 So. 2d 842 - Lyles v. State · 831 So. 2d 808 - Evans v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial court can commit error-even fundamental error-outside the presence of the jury by taking actions that obviously favor one side or the other.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“departed from a position of neutrality in an attempt to elicit testimony in support of the restitution award.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The requirement of judicial impartiality is at the core of our system of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.