Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 So. 3d 254 - Hall v. Hall

4 So. 3d 254 - Hall v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McAlpine v. McAlpine · Holliday v. Holliday · Lambert v. Lambert · 948 So. 2d 390 - Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick · 869 So. 2d 224 - Carmouche v. Carmouche

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Interim spousal support is designed to assist the claimant in sustaining the same style or standard of living that he or she enjoyed while residing with the other spouse, pending the litigation of the divorce.... The purpose of interim spousal support is to maintain the status quo without unnecessary economic dislocation until a final determination of support can be made and until a period of time for adjustment elapses that does not exceed, as a general rule, 180 days after the judgment of divorce.... The court may award an interim spousal support allowance to a spouse based on the needs of that spouse, the ability of the other spouse to pay, and the standard of living of the spouses during the marriage. ... 8”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.