Dobyne v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 547 So. 2d 870 - West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida · State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive · Lee v. City of Gadsden · Romer v. Board of County Commissioners · 792 So. 2d 369 - Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF ARCHITECTS
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[a]ll moneys ... furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of any law of this state; all proceeds traceable to such an exchange; and all moneys, negotiable instruments, and securities used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of any law of this state concerning controlled substances.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bolden v. State“Em]oney cannot be seized and forfeited merely because the person to whom it belongs is a convicted drug dealer. The State must prove to a 'reasonable satisfaction' an actual link between the money sought to be forfeited and a violation of the controlled-substances laws of this State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.