Ramirez v. McCravy’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 790 So. 2d 1071 - Major League Baseball v. Morsani · 767 So. 2d 1179 - Hearndon v. Graham · 841 So. 2d 510 - Ryan v. Lobo De Gonzalez · 864 So. 2d 79 - Patz v. Department of Health · Sullivan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The last administrative order covered the period from August 25 through August 31, 2006. Thus, Ramirez had more than six months after the last weather emergency forced the closure of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit. Ramirez has not explained how his late filing was attributable to any of the six weather emergencies. He has not alleged that these hurricanes or storms in any way “temporarily impeded the ability of [his] attorneys ... in the performance of their duties and obligations with respect to” the timely filing of his lawsuit. [[Image here]] Ramirez has not alleged that he relied on the administrative orders, or that they lulled him into inaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To toll means to suspend or interrupt. There is nothing intrinsic in the language that requires tacking extra days at the end of a four year period. Therefore, by strictly construing the administrative orders, we find that they have no application to this case, as the weather emergencies did not in any way delay Ramirez from promptly filing his suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.