4 So. 3d 752 - Ramirez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 969 So. 2d 222 - Lawson v. State · 428 So. 2d 739 - Hutchinson v. State · Holterhaus v. State · 368 So. 2d 363 - Watkins v. State · Haynes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A probationer must be violated for the reasons stated in the affidavit filed, and the reasons must be established by substantial competent evidence at the hearing. Further, the violation must mirror the language of the condition of probation allegedly violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKinnon v. State“[W]hile a probation officer may give routine, supervisory instructions to a 'probationer, the probation officer cannot prescribe new conditions of probation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“adequately place the probationer on notice of conduct that is both required and prohibited during the probationary period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKinnon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.