¶1The issue raised in this juvenile delinquency appeal is identical to the one raised in our recent decision in E.E. v. State, — So.3d-, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D534, 2009 WL 605399 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 11, 2009). As we did there, we reverse the disposition imposed in this case under the authority of E.A.R. v. State, 4 So.3d 614, 2009 WL 217979 (Fla. Jan. 30, 2009), and remand with instructions to hold a new disposition hearing complying with E.A.R. The court is free to require an updated PDR, and all parties should be allowed to present new evidence and argument for the ultimate disposition.
4 So. 3d 794
C.H. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 25, 2009
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-03-25
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2012
2 state decisions
Relies on 4 So. 3d 614 - EAR v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-03-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →