Halko v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Stump v. Bennett (1968), State v. Stump (1963)
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Bonomo · Rickards v. State · Freeman v. United States · State v. Lutz · Durden v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Sjince an alibi is only a denial of any connection with the crime, it must follow that if the proof adduced raises a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt, either by itself or in conjunction with all other facts in the case, the defendant must be acquitted.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stump · Jackson v. State““An offense can be said to be committed in the presence of an officer only when he sees it with his own eyes, or sees one or more of a series of acts constituting [the] offense, and is aided by his other senses or by information as to the others, when it may be said the offense was committed in his presence.” (Syl. ¶ 9.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.