Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Storey 199 - Wilson v. Derrickson

Wilson v. Derrickson’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

3 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2010

3 district · 17 state decisions

100196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robelen Piano Company v. Di Fonzo · Ciociola v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to prove the defendant’s negligence by circumstantial evidence, however, it is necessary that the conclusion of negligence be the only inference possible from the admitted circumstances. If, therefore, the proven circumstances are as consistent with the absence of negligence as with the existence ,of negligence, neither conclusion can be said to have been established by legitimate proof and the issue may not therefore be submitted to the jury.” (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a plaintiff may establish the negligence of the defendant by proof of circumstances from which an inference of negligence follows as a natural or very probable conclusion from the facts proven,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.