Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2010
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 240th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Liteky v. United States · McKinney v. Baldwin · Daniels v. Lassalle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the appeal is from a judgment rendered on the defendant’s plea of guilty or nolo contendere ... the notice must: (A) specify that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect [new]; (B) specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial [same as old rule]; or (C) state that the trial court granted permission to appeal [same as old rule].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marshall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.