Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Montgomery v. State · Clewis v. State · Sutton v. United States · Geesa v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) a listing of the elements of the offense; 2) an identification of the element(s) on which the evidence is alleged to be insufficient; 3) a statement attacking either the legal or factual sufficiency of the evidence; 4) a discussion or statement of the applicable standard of review; 5) a discussion of the evidence which is contained in the record (with citations to the record); 6) a discussion of the law which is applicable to the case and the admissibility of the evidence (steps 5 and 6 can be presented in reverse); and 7) a discussion of the application of the law to the specific facts of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Purvis v. State“A brief asserting legal or factual insufficiency of the evidence is helpful when it focuses our attention on the disputed issues, specifies each element of the crime or cause of action, and specifies which element lacks evidentiary support. The brief should contain a discussion of the relevant evidence and why that evidence is not sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Aguilar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.