4 Tenn. Crim. App. 228 - Nelson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Fay v. Noia · Douglas v. Alabama · Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company · Page v. Work
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Error in the admission or exclusion of testimony, in charging a jury, or refusing further instructions, misconduct of jurors, parties or counsel, or other action occur-ing [sic] or committed on the trial of the case, civil or criminal, or other grounds upon which a new trial is sought, will not constitute a ground for reversal, and a new trial, unless it affirmatively appears that the same was specifically stated in the motion made for a new trial in the lower court, and decided adversely to the plaintiff in error, but will be treated as waived, in all cases in which motions for a new trial are permitted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whisnant v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.