Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 U.S. 196

Mather v. Pratt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1800

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1800-12

This was an action brought by the plaintiff, as indorsee and holder of several promissory notes, made by Dorey & Bayhir, in favor of Joseph Mussi, against the defendants, to whom Dorey & Bayhir had assigned all their estate, in trust for the payment, pro rata, of such of their creditors, as should, within a certain period, execute a general release ; and the dividend of the non-assenting creditors was to be paid to them.

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1939

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1800-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Assignment for the benefit of creditors.

¶2Where there is an assignment for the benefit of such creditors of the assignors, as shall, -within a certain period, execute a general release to them, a creditor who has not executed the release, cannot maintain an action against the assignees. (a)

¶3This was an action brought by the plaintiff, as indorsee and holder of several promissory notes, made by Dorey & Bayhir, in favor of Joseph Mussi, against the defendants, to whom Dorey & Bayhir had assigned all their estate, in trust for the payment, pro rata, of such of their creditors, as should, within a certain period, execute a general release ; and the dividend of the non-assenting creditors was to be paid to them. The plaintiff had not executed the release ; and it was objected, that he could not sue the trustees, even for a dividend, in his own name, without performing the condition precedent.

¶4M. Levy, for the plaintiff. Dallas, for the defendant.

¶6The Court were unanimously, and clearly, of this opinion; and the plaintiff suffered a nonsuit. (b)

/4/us/196 · .json · Public domain