Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 U.S. 426 - The United States v. James McGill

The United States v. James McGill’s Empirical Analysis

1806

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1986

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

401806181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court could only take cognizance of a murder committed on the high seas; and as murder consists in both the stroke and the consequent death, both parts of the crime must happen on the high seas to give jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.