¶1This is the first time such a case hás occurred before me; and if the practice has been as Mr. Williams states it, it was unauthorized, for when a suit abates against a resident party, it cannot be revived unless there is an appearance for him, or process returned executed, and then the order is made, and not before: and s,o with respect to a non-resident party, on whom process cannot be served, in lieu of which an order of publication is made, for two months in a public newspaper; and then, and not before, the suit should be revived; and then, and not before, it should be proceeded in : and, therefore, the last report in this case must be recommitted, as having been made under an order which was made when the representatives of Charles Patterson were not before the Court; The practice upon this point is now settled.
4 Va. 445
Duguid v. Patterson
Decided June 15, 1809
Virginia Chancery Court · decided 1809-06-15
IN 180o this suit abated as to Charles Patterson, one of the principal defendants, and there was ail order of publicátioií against bis representatives who lived in Kentucky, in March, 1807. In September following, there was an additional order for an account.
Decided 1809-06-15