Dacoron v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2012
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 38 U.S.C. § 107 · 38 U.S.C. § 1310 · 38 U.S.C. § 1975 · 38 U.S.C. § 501 · 38 U.S.C. § 502 · 38 U.S.C. § 511
Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Johnson v. Robison · Freytag v. Commissioner · United States Girard Trust Co v. Helvering · Ganem v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although this Court also has authority to reach constitutional issues in considering petitions for extraordinary writs under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a), the Court may, as noted above, exercise such authority only when a claimant has demonstrated that he or she has no adequate alternative means of obtaining the relief sought and is clearly and indisputably entitled to such relief. See Erspamer [v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 3, 7 (1990) ]. Where, as here, a claimant remains free to challenge the constitutionality of a statute in the U.S. district court, she has not demonstrated that she lacks adequate alternative means of obtaining the relief sought.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.