Brady v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1110 · 38 U.S.C. § 1155 · 38 U.S.C. § 5107 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on Gilbert v. Derwinski · Colvin v. Derwinski · Murphy v. Derwinski · Godwin v. Derwinski · Thompson v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When two diagnoses, one organic and the other psychological or psychoneurotic, are presented covering the organic and psychiatric aspects of a single disability entity, only one percentage rating mil be assigned under the appropriate diagnostic code determined by the rating board to represent the major degree of disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Esteban v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.