Spencer v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Spencer v. Brown (1994), Crippen v. Brown (1996)
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1110 · 38 U.S.C. § 5108 · 38 U.S.C. § 5110 · 38 U.S.C. § 7103 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation Survivors · United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co. · Hynes v. Grimes Packing Co · Sullivan v. Everhart · Colvin v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pursuant to any Act or administrative issue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Spencer v. Brown · Routen v. West“[I]t is made clear [by 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (a)] that such “reopening” will not have retroactive effect relating back to the original claim but will have the attributes of a new claim with regard to effective date. Although, as noted in subpart iii., above, the use of “reopening” in prior statutory provisions may have connoted only adjudication of a finally denied claim on the basis of the original application, with any award being retroactive to the date of that application, the use of that term in [§ 5110(a)] since 1962 and in § 5108 pursuant to the VJRA makes clear that “reopening” now refers as well to claims based on new and material evidence from sources other than service department reports; in essence, such claims are treated as new claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sears v. Principi“[wjhen a provision of law or regulation creates a new basis of entitlement to benefits, as through liberalization of the requirements for entitlement to a benefit, an applicant’s claim of entitlement under such law or regulation is a claim separate and distinct from a claim previously and finally denied prior to the liberalizing law or regulation. The applicant’s later claim, asserting rights which did not exist at the time of the prior claim, is necessarily a different claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spencer v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.