Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Wash. 2d 253 - Peeples v. Hayes

4 Wash. 2d 253 - Peeples v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1988

2 state decisions

3019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Case v. Beauregard · Henry Wyman v. Sumner Wallace · Case v. Beauregard · Shirley v. Waco Tap Railway Co. · Cornell v. Edsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The limitation is not one that goes to the remedy of a defendant, like the ordinary statute of limitation, but it goes to the cause of action or right to sue. The time prescribed—six months from the time of filing the application for appointment of the trustee for the commencement of the action—is a condition to the enforcement of the liability or the trustee's right of recovery, an element in the right itself. The right falls with the failure to commence the action within the allotted time." Furthermore, the limitation is not for the benefit of those against whom actions are brought, but it is primarily for the benefit of the creditors of the insolvent corporation on whose behalf the action is prosecuted. Its primary purpose is to insure that their rights in the trust fund will be enforced promptly and without unreasonable delay. . . . This proceeding, though statutory in form, is governed wholly by equitable principles . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.