Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Wash. App. 204 - Mose v. Mose

4 Wash. App. 204 - Mose v. Mose’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2015

10 state decisions

8019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McLean v. United States · 59 Wash. 2d 639 - Morgan v. Morgan · 72 Wash. 2d 144 - Roach v. Roach · 72 Wash. 2d 532 - Berg v. Berg · 64 Wash. 2d 617 - Hogberg v. Hogberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Federal military pensions are subject to certain contingencies set out by federal statute. As such it is not a fixed asset but is an emolument or economic advantage of office. McLean v. United States, 226 U.S. 374 , 57 L. Ed. 260 , 33 Sup. Ct. 122 (1912). It is an income resource which should be considered by the court in fixing the amount of the alimony award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “permanent alimony (not to terminate upon her remarriage).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.