Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Ala. App. 600 - Smith v. State

40 Ala. App. 600 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1994 · most notably Watson v. State (1980), 47 Ala. App. 182 - Felton v. State (1971)

27 state decisions

1401960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nichols v. State · 38 Ala. App. 490 - Arthur v. State · 19 Ala. App. 592 - Parcus v. State · 19 Ala. App. 592 - Acker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that evidence which is introduced in a case may be, if objected to, incompetent evidence under some one or more exclusionary rules of evidence does not destroy its probative effect, if it is admitted without objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.