Aller v. Berkeley Hall School Foundation’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2012
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Firth v. Marovich · Burnett v. Piercy · Alderson v. Cutting · Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. Marr · Victoria Hospital Assoc. v. All Persons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is clear that the restriction in the deed which provides that ‘all buildings to be erected on Doheny Drive’ shall be exclusively for private residences, means that all lots fronting on Doheny drive are to be used for residence purpose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hoover v. Waggoman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.