Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 CALAPP4TH 961 - Runyan v. Ellis

Runyan v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2017

22 state decisions

190199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 31 Cal. 3d 676 - White v. County of Sacramento · 16 Cal. App. 4th 1795 - Binkley v. City of Long Beach · 88 Cal. App. 3d 957 - Verdugo Hills Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given the only existing apparatus in the city for an administrative appeal by police officers is found with the civil service commission, and pursuant to our opinion in Stowe, Runyan is entitled to an administrative appeal before the civil service commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any action that may lead to dismissal, demotion, suspension, reduction in salary, written reprimand, or transfer for purposes of punishment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.