Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 CALAPPSUPP2D 835 - People v. McNutt

People v. McNutt’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2018

1 district · 17 state decisions

4019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burns's Case · 132 Cal. App. 124 - Howard v. Howard · Norton v. Puter · Kastel v. Stieber · 104 Cal. App. 733 - Albers v. Shell Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On consideration of all these authorities we find no substantial difference between wilful misconduct and reckless driving, and conclude that they are in truth the same thing, so far as they are concerned with the state of mind of the driver whose conduct is in question, so that the decisions construing the term ‘wilful misconduct’ may be applied to the statutory provision prohibiting ‘reckless driving’.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in wilful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`Wilful misconduct implies at least the intentional doing of something either with a knowledge that serious injury is a probable (as distinguished from a possible) result, or the intentional doing of an act with a wanton and reckless disregard of its possible result.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.