State v. Leduc’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably State v. Berube (2001), State v. Karlen (1999)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Davis v. Alaska · Michigan v. Long · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] state's attorney shall disclose to the defendant or his counsel in a criminal prosecution, without the necessity of a court order, exculpatory information and material contained in such record and may disclose, without a court order, information and material contained in such record which could be the subject of a disclosure order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“information discovered during [the] in camera inspection [which] `probably would have changed the outcome of [the] trial,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[f]avorable evidence . . . which . . . might have led the jury to entertain a reasonable doubt about . . . guilt . . .,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.