Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Conn. Super. Ct. 111 - Dube v. Lopes

40 Conn. Super. Ct. 111 - Dube v. Lopes’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
8
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2005

13 state decisions

80198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · Shillitani v. United States · Maggio v. Zeitz · Tobey v. Tobey · McTigue v. New London Education Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'t is crystal clear that a person may not be incarcerated by the state without first being advised of his constitutional right to counsel, and, if indigent, without having counsel appointed to represent him, whether the contempt proceedings are initiated by a private person or the state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.