Castro v. Seeberger’s Empirical Analysis
40 F. 531 · 1889
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1930
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Cohn v. Spalding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Castro had purchased the merchandise of. the importer while it was in bond, and pending an appeal, and after the decision of the appeal paid the duties assessed in order to obtain possession of the property, and thereupon brought' the suit, . . . the purchaser obtained an interest in the thing itself”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Seeberger v. Castro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.