United States v. Tutiven’s Empirical Analysis
40 F.3d 1 · 1994
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably United States v. Manning (1996), 957 So. 2d 1280 - State v. MacOn (2007)
20 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313 · 18 U.S.C. § 2321
Relies on United States v. Olano · Commissioner v. Engle · Yates v. Evatt · United States v. Park · Nebraska v. Wyoming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All vehicles bear the public VIN and the federal certification VIN; ninety-five percent bear a confidential VIN. The confidential VIN, which is stamped into the metal of the vehicle, is the most difficult to locate and alter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“other crimes, wrongs, or acts are relevant exclusively to instigate an inference that the defendant is more likely to have acted in similar fashion by committing the offense for which he is on trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.