Brockman v. Merabank’s Empirical Analysis
40 F.3d 1013 · 1994
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2010
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1441A · 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Rufo v. Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pretrial conference, the district court sua sponte ordered the case remanded to state court for lack of jurisdiction. The court reasoned that it lacked jurisdiction because the party seeking removal, the FDIC, had been dismissed from the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Like diversity jurisdiction, original jurisdiction is not discretionary. Thus, the district court could neither dismiss the entire case for lack of jurisdiction nor remand it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of federal law. See Osborn, 22 U.S. at 823 . Thus, the explicit language of Article III authorizes Congress to vest federal courts with jurisdiction over any”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brockman v. Merabank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.