Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 1041 - Gini v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Gini v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 1041 · 1994

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Suarez Corporation Industries v. Darrell V. Mcgraw, Jr. (2000), Kwai Fun Wong v. United States (2004)

28 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

3501994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Paul v. Davis · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]amage to reputation is not actionable under § 1983 unless it is accompanied by ‘some more tangible interests.’ ”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[i]n the usual case in which federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors ... will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the judgment with instructions that it be modified to make clear that dismissal of the pendent claims [was] without prejudice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.